13WHAM Weather Authority Alert: Severe Thunderstorm Watch expires at 11:00 PM on 5/22, issued at 3:39 PM Adams Basin, NY | Alton, NY | Arcade, NY | Attica, NY

BLOG: The Massa Side of the Story (UPDATE)

Reported by: Sean Carroll
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/23/2010 1:45 pm
Friday, 3/5, 11:30pm. --- Attempting to clear up an apparent inconsistency in Rep. Massa's resignation statement, and what his Chief of Staff told me Thursday night.  What didn't add up was that Rep. Massa's statement seemed to conclude that the Congressman just learned of this Ethics Committee investigation (let alone the inquiry) on Thursday.  Here's that portion of the statement:

"After I decided not to run again I was told, for the first time, that a member of my staff believed I had made statements that made him feel “uncomfortable.”

Chief of Staff Racalto told me this on Thursday:

"he (Racalto) was interviewed by the Ethics Committee about two and a half weeks ago 'about this matter,' but he said he couldn't discuss that in further detail."

So the explanation from Racalto is that he and Rep. Massa didn't consider this to be anything more than a routine inquiry until the Ethics Committee contacted him Thursday and requested to speak with him.  Racalto tells me that from his interview he couldn't gather the specific nature of the allegation/complaint but assumed - and still does - that this is entirely "language-based" and (My Note: perhaps too quickly?) concluded this was not a matter to be overly concerned about.  Of course that changed once Ethics Committee contacted them again.

My Take:  Seems a convenient explanation, albeit plausible.  I'm not intimately aware of the dealings & procedures of the House Ethics Committee but perhaps the inquiry did appear routine at first?  My understanding is that Rep. Massa's office has had a few inquiries made by the Ethics Committee in his short time in office.  How legitimate any of them are is anyone's guess but the legitimacy of this one is all that matters currently.  I'll also buy (although it's not being "sold" to me in this case) that the Congressman's current health is a more than plausible explanation for he and his staff to dismiss such an inquiry.  A curse word vs. a cancer battle - not a one of us worries about the former, right?

That being said, it's still an inconsistency.  It's more logical to assume that Rep. Massa's Chief of Staff knew the nature of the inquiry, relayed it to his boss, and they made subsequent decisions accordingly.  Hindsight will prove informative for sure - if in the end we all learn this inquiry-turned-investigation was nothing more than some "salty" language that made a staffer feel "uncomfortable" than I would say this inconsistency is understandable and explainable.  If in the end we find that "salty" and "uncomfortable" are two words that far from describe a much more serious situation than I think it's more than reasonable for us to assume this inconsistency was by design.

As I stated at the close of my Wednesday entry - and continue to state again tonight amid even more sensational rumors and reports - this is a storyline that deserves diligent journalism and time.  Ethics Committee Investigation or not, constituents deserve an honest, thorough, and comprehensive explanation for the resignation of their Congressman.
Thursday, 3/4, 11:45pm ---  Spoke to Rep. Massa's Chief of Staff again tonight.  In short he confirms the House Ethics Committee in the midst of a formal inquiry.  Moreover, there is a formal request from Ethics Committee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Ranking Republican Member Jo Bonner (R-Ala) to meet with Rep. Massa.

Racalto (Massa's Chief of Staff) also said that he was interviewed by the Ethics Committee about two and a half weeks ago "about this matter," but he said he couldn't discuss that in further detail.

My Take:  There's more to all of this, obviously, but I'm getting the impression it's not quite as many of the blogs/reports/etc. are stating.  That being said, this is just one side of the story, and I'm more aware of that than anyone.  I've got a few leads I'm pursuing to offer more balance to this, so don't jump to conclusions on that end -- but thus far, as I said before, the only substance I'm hearing is coming from Racalto.  Aside from a Hoyer release and a one sentence Ethics Committee statement, are you seeing any reports with sources attaching their names?  (Literally asking that of readers/viewers and inviting that of anyone -- my email's attached so please contact me.) 

More to come for sure.

------------------------------------------
Congressman Eric Massa
Congressman Eric Massa

Wednesday, March 3: It was a busy day, and my Blackberry seemed glued to my ear and fingers the whole time.  My last phone conversation of the night was a long one with Congressman Eric Massa’s Chief of Staff, Joe Racalto.  I’m sure I’ll have more phone conversations with all sorts of people tomorrow and in many of the coming days when it comes to Rep. Massa’s stepping down at the end of this term -– but to Racalto’s credit he offers me the most substance on this news story thus far. So here goes:


As to Rep. Massa’s Health:  This is why he announced today that he’s not seeking re-election.  Racalto tells me he picked Massa up from the hospital in December, the morning of his cancer exam; as you may know, he’s survived cancer once already in this life.  There were abnormal blood conditions during that physical and there is/was a threat to his health.   Racalto says that since then Massa’s schedule has been cleared at certain times, most recently last week, so he and his family can discuss what course of action should be taken. “He is retiring for health reasons,” Racalto said. “The reality is he’s sick.”

Racalto tells me the conversation kept coming back to a simple question: “At what cost do you want to remain a Congressman?”  In the end, the answer often included a desire to see his two children graduate college.  (A son attends Syracuse University; a daughter is at Big East Rival Georgetown.)

As to Complaints & Allegations:  First and foremost, Racalto insists that Rep. Massa has never been contacted by the House Ethics Committee.  On Monday, Racalto says he reached out to the Ethics Committee to see if it had any information concerning allegations or complaints against Rep. Massa.  “I’ve asked for a formal complaint, and they’ve told me they don’t have one,” Racalto said.  “I’d be happy to comment on the complaint if there is one.”

Racalto said that the law states after 19 days the committee has to produce a complaint if substantiated.  (Writer’s note: I will attempt to independently verify this Thursday.)  Wednesday night, the Associated Press reports that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer claims to have received a report “the week of Feb. 8” about allegations by a staff member in Rep. Eric Massa’s office.  With that in mind, the 19-day window could still be open as I understand it; once again I’ll try to learn more about this Thursday.

Various reports swirling seem to reference the sources as “aides from both sides of the aisle” to which Racalto wonders, who?  Interns?  Ex-employees?  Staffers from some other Representative’s office?  Who is not speaking up as a named source?  Personally, I’m sure we’re all wondering to some degree where these unnamed sources are coming from… most especially in light of what we’re seeing unfold in Albany with Governor David Paterson and a month’s worth of rumors and reports.  But to this point Racalto tells me he and Rep. Massa are actually looking forward to responding to whatever complaint or allegation may or may not exist.  “Just tell me what I’m fighting,” Racalto said.

Left with little knowledge of any actual allegation (so says Racalto), Rep. Massa sort of assumed it must be related to “salty” language – which he made reference to in his announcement Wednesday.  “We’re talking about a Navy guy, he uses salty language,” Racalto said.  Racalto also added that there have been other complaints in the office related to language used by Rep. Massa and other staffers.

To the specific reports circulating about harassment allegations, be them sexual in nature or not depending on the report you read, Racalto had this to say:  “I can confirm my sitting staff has not contacted them (Ethics Committee)…I can confirm to the best of my knowledge that the harassment charges are unfounded.”

Lastly on this point, Racalto insists it is he and Rep. Massa who voluntarily bring forth any word of complaints against (or within) their office directly to Rep. Hoyer and Speaker Pelosi.  Racalto said they don’t have to but they choose to play everything “above board” and so that’s how they proceed with any such complaint.
A release late Wednesday night from Rep. Hoyer’s office further confirms that “a member of Rep. Massa’s staff” brought this to the attention of his staff and later to the bipartisan Ethics Committee.

My Take:  I avoid editorializing, I hope you know, but I don’t think it’s an “opinion” to say that we should all see how this plays out.  I know from covering his campaigns and term in office thus far that health is a more than legitimate concern for Rep. Massa; he’s a cancer survivor with a “full speed ahead” attitude that happens to be Congressman; I would expect that’s a challenging mix on the human body.

As to all of these other allegations, complaints, reports, and rumors?  You’ve heard one side of it above, and we’ll no doubt hear other sides. Heck, we may even hear this side change its tune in the coming days and weeks.  I suggest we apply some diligent journalism to these various reports and figure out if there really is another reason for Massa’s stepping down.  As of this posting, I'm not seeing a substantiated one, but I’ll post again the moment I believe differently.

Share
50 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

clone - 3/8/2010 1:12 AM
0 Votes
Nice use of the "cancer" card. And way to keep a smile on your face the whole time you are discussing your attempts soliciting sex from another man. If you were not a politician, I might be shocked.

clavin - 3/7/2010 6:01 PM
0 Votes
You think he would give it all up for a few off color jokes? Come on...

Dee319 - 3/6/2010 4:59 PM
0 Votes
We still dont really know what the accusation is. What exactly is "salty language"? Could this be (not excusing it of course) something to the likes of going to an office party and making a few sexually explicit jokes, maybe saying to these male staffers " look at the rack on that new intern of ours" or possibly in conversation suggesting that the male staffers were gay in some way, or did he say in essence all the sexual things that he wanted to do with them? There are many different levels of sexual harassment. Granted if conversation in a workplace makes someone uncomfortable or embarrassed it is classified as sexual harassment, If someone says sleep with me and you can have a promotion but if you dont someone else with... that is also under the big blanket of sexual harassment. So what did he do tell a bad joke? Did have a couple of drinks one night and pinch a secratary's butt or grab someones crotch? Although I figured there was more to it than he was just sick... no one has said on which end of the sexual harassment spectrum the allegations lie.

antietam - 3/5/2010 5:01 PM
0 Votes
Well as a Navy man, Massa might have been confused when his subordinates asked to use the 'HEAD'.

thosb458 - 3/5/2010 4:03 PM
0 Votes
Perhaps the male staffer was unsure on the definition of 'seamen'. Maybe Massa should've spoke of naval personnel instead.

thosb458 - 3/5/2010 3:58 PM
0 Votes
Oops, the plot thickens! Guess the rumour has moved into a new category.

clavin - 3/5/2010 3:56 PM
2 Votes
PS. Aruba, you have never proven me wrong, not once, not now, not ever.

clavin - 3/5/2010 3:36 PM
1 Vote
ALLEGATION: An allegation (also called adduction) is a claim of a fact by a party in a pleading, which the party claims to be able to prove. Allegations remain assertions without proof, until they can be proved. FROM THE ARTICLE: As to Complaints & Allegations: First and foremost, Racalto insists that Rep. Massa has never been contacted by the House Ethics Committee. On Monday, Racalto says he reached out to the Ethics Committee to see if it had any information concerning allegations or complaints against Rep. Massa. “I’ve asked for a formal complaint, and they’ve told me they don’t have one,” Racalto said. “I’d be happy to comment on the complaint if there is one.” Racalto said that the law states after 19 days the committee has to produce a complaint if substantiated. (Writer’s note: I will attempt to independently verify this Thursday.) Wednesday night, the Associated Press reports that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer claims to have received a report “the week of Feb. 8” about allegations by a staff member in Rep. Eric Massa’s office. With that in mind, the 19-day window could still be open as I understand it; once again I’ll try to learn more about this Thursday.

thosb458 - 3/5/2010 3:36 PM
2 Votes
Rumor might work in this regard except that currently there is an investigation, from a bi-partisan group, into accusations against Massa. Steny Hoyer has used the word allegation as opposed to rumor. Why would someone as close the situation as Steny is, use the word allegation as opposed to rumour?

thearubagirl - 3/5/2010 3:13 PM
0 Votes
ru·mor (rmr) n. 1. A piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth. 2. Unverified information received from another; hearsay. tr.v. ru·mored, ru·mor·ing, ru·mors To spread or tell by rumor. [Middle English rumour, from Old French, from Latin rmor.] WRONG AGAIN CLOVER
13WHAM on Twitter
13WHAM on Twitter
    State News
    Face Transplant Surgery - 27 Hours
    Warsaw, Poland (AP) - Doctors in Poland say they have performed an urgent total face transplant on a 33-year-old man whose face was torn off in an accident which also crushed his jaws.
    more state news... 
    National News
    Judge sorry for delay in case of gov't information leak
    A federal judge is apologizing for an 18-month delay in unsealing documents in a case involving an alleged leak of classified information by a government employee to a television news reporter.
    9 minutes ago
    more national news... 

    TheOffice

    Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
    Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.