Dozens of Houses Could be Demolished in E. Main Corridor

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 10/11/2011 6:41 pm
Rochester, N.Y. – The city is considering leveling swaths of land in the East Main Street corridor in what could be the beginning of a larger movement to “right-size” the housing stock and “green” the city. The houses would be replaced by parks or other green space.

The information is contained in the city’s Request for Proposals seeking consultants to come up with a plan to revitalize East Main Street between Goodman St. and Culver Rd.

Nineteen properties on East Main Street, as well as an entire block on Hayward and Garson avenues would be torn down. Other properties on Hayward and Chamberlain would be demolished as part of RGRTA’s expansion.

The areas identified for greening have high rates of vacancies and absentee landlords.

The city came up with “Project Green” in 2009, a plan to strategically level blighted blocks and install parks, gardens, urban farms, or forests. Residents would have to be relocated. The East Main Street RFP is the first signal that the city could be moving forward with Project Green.

“There’s a lot of empty houses and why keep an empty house if you can just tear it down and put something there,” said Amilka Aldana, who lives across from houses that would be torn down on Garson Ave. She said children often play in the street.

Pamela Jenkins lives in one of the targeted houses and was dismayed. “It’s a decent neighborhood for your kids. So I don’t understand, talk about make it a park. Make a park downtown.”

Kyle Crandall, president of the Beechwood Neighborhood Association, is excited the city wants to revitalize East Main Street, but he’s not so sure about the greening component.

“We need time to review that, hopefully be able to meet with the city and see whether or not green space is the best for those areas, or whether it be better as a commercial district or other ideas,” Crandall said.

The consultant hired for the project would have to solicit community input.

The RFP said ReHouse Rochester could be involved in deconstructing houses. The shop on East Main Street salvages and sells parts such as windows, doors, and fixtures.

“It is Main Street, usually the most important street in the city,” said Jay Rowe, an employee. “They’ve let it go. I think it would be great if they paid a lot more attention to it.”
Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

Genny - 10/13/2011 3:52 PM
0 Votes
I live just a few blocks away and that area is swarming with drugs and violence. Renovation wont save rotted and neglected homes deserted by landlords who already aren't paying taxes or contributing to the community. Its a deeply impoverished area with a failing school district. Green space would at least alleviate the eyesore that its become and allow for the possibility of new homes or businesses down the road.

defeller - 10/12/2011 9:58 PM
1 Vote
The city needs to start addressing the reason why houses are becoming vacant rather than simply reacting to the vacancies. Demolishing houses has not and will not solve the problems, it will merely move the problems to other houses (which in turn will eventually be torn down). Other cities have successfully revitalized their neighborhoods, while Rochester it trying to repeat the mistake of the old Urban Renewal demolition programs with Urban Renewal 2.0. We need to learn from successful programs instead of trying to repeat the same mistakes again. As Bobbin pointed out, there is nothing green about the city's program at all. A true green program would recycle buildings and neighborhoods. And the talk of "parks" is rather misleading, as a true park would be expensive to build. In reality, the city is talking about creating vacant lots and dubbing them "green space."

Bobbin - 10/12/2011 2:53 PM
1 Vote
Hasn't Rochester torn down enough buildings. They never learn do they. Midtown was a landmark. Why tear them down-- these buildings can be renovated and put back on the tax rolls. The green movement is all about reuse, saving of energy and materials. All the green we are talking here about is grass and green money. Some consultant and the a contractor or two will be making green money. What are they thinking.

Bobbin - 10/12/2011 2:48 PM
1 Vote
Hasn't the city torn down enough buildings!!! What about a homestead program and/or reno help???? Rochester is so behind the times.

Maine1 - 10/11/2011 7:26 PM
2 Votes
I drive by here every day, the houses are a mess, garbage everywhere, and the people there look very poor. I hope they can find a better place to live, it is NOT a good neighborhood for kids! Most of the houses actually look dangerous to live in. I say go for it!

Jimmy123 - 10/11/2011 3:35 PM
2 Votes
NOOOOO! I want Rochester to be a CITY, and an URBAN one of that. We already have PLENTY of green space and way TOO MUCH SUBURBAN LAYOUT within city boarders.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.