13WHAM Weather Authority Alert: Freeze Warning expires at 8:00 AM on 5/26, issued at 1:46 PM Hunt, NY

Hojack Swing Bridge to Come Down, CSX Says

Posted by: Rachel Barnhart
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/12/2011 8:07 pm
Rochester, N.Y. – It’s been part of the scenery at the Port of Rochester for more than a century. To some, the Hojack Swing Bridge is a beautiful landmark, but to others, it’s a piece of junk.

Soon, it could be a piece of history.

CSX has applied for a bevy of permits to demolish the bridge, saying it is under orders from the U.S. Coast Guard to remove the structure. The Coast Guard confirms it considers the bridge a safety hazard.

“CSX is working with federal state and local agencies as it prepares to comply with a U.S. Coast Guard order to remove the Hojack Swing Bridge on the Genesee River. Planning is still in progress and no other specific details are available at this time,” said CSX spokesman Bob Sullivan in an email.

In documents laying out the project to bidders, CSX said it wants the bridge removed by March 2012. It does not specify a cost. Some of the rail ties may contain asbestos.

There has long been debate about removing the structure. In a 2003 New York Times article, then-Mayor William Johnson called the bridge "a monstrosity covered with moss" that he didn't want visitors from Toronto arriving on the fast ferry to encounter.

Built in 1905, the Hojack Swing Bridge used to serve farms along the lakeshore. It stopped carrying revenue rail cars in 1978, according to a report prepared by the Army Corps of Engineers in 2001 about the bridge’s historical value. The last time the swing bridge was rotated was in the mid-90s. The study says the state declared the bridge eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The report recommended preserving the bridge’s value through displays of artifacts and markers, but did not recommend saving the entire structure.

“This is part of Rochester’s history,” said Richard Rosen, a local preservationist and architect. “I think it is foolhardy for CSX to demolish the thing until someone with experience in destination venues has had a chance to look at this.”

“It’s a great conversation piece. I have probably 5 to 10 conversations daily with our customers about it,” said Marcus Germonto, general manager of the Pelican’s Nest restaurant.

"It’s pretty decrepit, but it is a landmark,” said Terry Commins, a diner.

“I think it’s too bad. It’s been in the river for all my life. It’s just a piece of the river," said boater Mark Thomas.

“That thing is a navigational hazard, always has been,” said boater Jack Kearney.

CSX has not gotten approvals to tear down the bridge. It needs the green light from the city, Department of Environmental Conservation, Army Corps of Engineers and Coast Guard for its demolition plan.
Share
13 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

RosemaryPepper - 9/17/2011 9:42 AM
0 Votes
Somebody please tell the reporter that the "r" in Charlotte is not pronounced. It's "Schlot" or "Shalott," but it's not "ChaRlot." Everyone, please take lots of high def pics of the bridge!

cbarnes649 - 9/13/2011 1:51 PM
1 Vote
OK how about this guys??? Put some money into it. Bring it back up to Bar, and make it worth sitting there in the water. All it needs is a little TLC and some money to make it safe again. We waste all this money on the port of rochester, and u want to get rid of a historical landmark. Get a Life!

houston - 9/13/2011 10:05 AM
0 Votes
...Ok now 'that' is being seen as an eye sore, how about all the unused overpasses from here to Lockport that a Half dozen tractor trailers hit every year that are still in place because...they are what...pretty?, the bankrupt train line that built them needs to take those down also because they endanger human life and property.

JS1234 - 9/13/2011 8:28 AM
0 Votes
I simply cannot fathom why ANYONE would want this eyesore to remain in the river. What are you thinking???? Have you looked at it lately? Try to imagine how much better the view would be without that horrid piece of rusted metal. It's probably a health hazard to boot with all the pigeon droppings. Get it outta here!!!

NyGregg - 9/12/2011 9:06 PM
0 Votes
@ Neighbor53 a short time back MANY communities voted against allowing wind turbines to be installed off of their shoreline due to the fact that they thought they would be an eyesore and that they would kill birds....both being wrong. They don't turn like a house fan and if you have ever been on a boat 7 miles or more out...you can't see shore. I am amazed at how people will cling to this type of object that has no current value (actually is a detriment both financially and physically) but won't see the potential for progress with other projects. Kind of typical with a lot of politicians too....no wonder the country is going in the toilet. No foresight.

EmeraldStarlet - 9/12/2011 8:19 PM
0 Votes
Littlebug, that's a wonderful idea! I was thinking of that tonight when I was telling my husband at dinner. Plus, I think swing bridges are somewhat rare, especially from this time period. I completely understand what the boaters are saying, but at the same time it's sad to lose another piece of history.

littlebug218 - 9/12/2011 6:56 PM
1 Vote
I have a suggestion. Why not move it to The New York Museum of Transportation, Since it was a big part of the Rochester Railway system for years.

Bob Harker - 9/12/2011 6:53 PM
0 Votes
I wonder what it would have cost to demolish in 1978 like it should have been. It's ugly, a hazard, and useless. To the writer that recommended a revolving restaurant, what a pipe dream! The cost to even STUDY such an endeavor would be more than any ROI. Multimillion dollars of investment (if it could even be done) in a dead and dieing "harbor" and city? Refer to First Federal.

dynamicdave - 9/12/2011 5:39 PM
0 Votes
NyGregg - Wind turbines are in the planing stages. That is why Iberdrola who owns RG$E disabled Russell Station. The water intake tunnel for Russell will be used to bring the power ashore.

EmeraldStarlet - 9/12/2011 5:37 PM
0 Votes
Having grown up in Irondequoit, I have always loved looking at this bridge! It is a piece of history that would be nice to keep and NYGregg, I have absolutely no idea why they won't allow wind mills in the middle of Lake Ontario...it's a waste of space out there.

DapperDash

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.