NY-26: 3 Very Different Candidates in Tight Race

Reported by: Sean Carroll
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 5/10/2011 10:03 am
Transit Road in Erie County, N.Y. --- Three Congressional campaigns converged on a busy stretch of road lined with retail shops, restaurants, and small businesses on Monday.  With a special election scheduled for May 24th each candidate's goal remains the same; but Monday’s events showed the candidates, their campaigns, and their messages are very different.
Jack Davis
Jack Davis

Davis & The Hot Dog Stand

Just before noon at a hot dog stand on Transit Road, millionaire industrialist Jack Davis pulled up in his silver Cadillac with a smile on his face and a handshake for some mildly surprised customers.  Davis is running on a self-created Tea Party ballot line after being turned away by Democrat and Republican Party leaders.  While Davis trails in the few NY-26 polls released so far, he believes it’s his opponents who should worry.

"Washington's on a shopping trip to buy another Congressman from this district,” Davis said while referencing a campaign visit from House Speaker John Boehner up the road from this hot dog stand.  "I'm constantly on one message: saving jobs.  I'm not a Democrat and I'm not a Republican anymore, I am an Independent and they are both running frightened and they can't challenge my background, they can't say I'm being bought, so they tell lies about me.”

Davis ran as a Democrat for this Congressional seat three times before; losing in 2004 and 2006 to Republican incumbent Tom Reynolds and losing in a three-way Democratic primary in 2008.

Jane Corwin & Speaker John Boehner
Jane Corwin & Speaker John Boehner

Corwin & The House Speaker Fundraiser

While Davis shook hands at a hot dog stand it was Republican Assemblywoman Jane Corwin who hosted Speaker of the House John Boehner at an expensive fundraiser barely one mile down the road.  The leader of the Republican Party’s takeover of Congress last fall provides some big-name boost to the Corwin campaign at a time when polls show her holding a vulnerable lead.

Corwin’s event drew past and present Congressional Representatives and hundreds of influential party-faithful from the western portion of the NY-26.  Both Corwin and Boehner spoke of the continued need to cut government spending, lower taxes, and create more jobs. 

"Our country's going in the wrong direction and we need to turn it around and the only way we can do that is by working with other members in government to make it happen,” Corwin said following Boehner’s endorsement. 

Yet, like her opponents, Corwin also managed to find a moment to take a few shots at her opponents.

"I knew it would be interesting with three candidates in the race but I never in a million years could've imagined what a clear difference there would be between me and my two opponents,” Corwin told the crowd.  “Jack Davis and Kathy Hochul, both supported by Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats in Washington, believe government is the answer to our problems.”

Kathy Hochul
Kathy Hochul

Hochul & The Fight For Seniors

As House Speaker Boehner and Candidate Corwin were wrapping up their event at a large restaurant and banquet hall, it was Democrat Kathy Hochul who was hosting seniors just north on Transit Road at her campaign office.  Hochul was announcing an endorsement of her own from the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

In a packed campaign office, Hochul spoke about her pledge to protect Medicare and Social Security benefits for seniors and citizens of all ages.

“The Republican budget would decimate Medicare,” Hochul said to the crowd before fielding questions on her campaign as it enters the final two weeks.

When asked about her opponent’s Transit Road campaign events, Hochul also made it a point to slip in a couple of jabs.

"One of my opponents is meeting with the leader of all this mess?” Hochul said of Corwin’s meeting with Speaker Boehner.  “That is the last person I'd want to be with today in light of what's happened to the people in this room.  So I think that is a difference in priorities and I'm proud to be with the people right here in this room.”

Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

truthseekertoo - 5/11/2011 3:23 PM
The bureaucratic hordes that copy, process and featherbed the business of the state require the government to extract even more taxpayer wealth. We are willing to pay the price for some government “services.” However, because government can only add to the net cost of any productive efforts, we cannot afford to let government take on obligations that we should and can do ourselves. Also, government should refrain from acts which are not at least based upon one of the “enumerated” powers; and, we cannot afford to let government tax more than it needs for legitimate activities. Government must remove the burdens and obstacles it has laid along the paths of commerce. It should not only, “just not raise taxes,” government should slash taxes; it should slash government spending; it should slash government payrolls and government employment and it should close all agencies that are not constitutionally authorized and necessary. The more government slashes, the more we, the people, will prosper. As taxpayers are permitted to keep more of the money each has earned, they will have more money to spend. As taxpayers spend more of their own money, the aggregate increases in individual purchasing power and consumer spending across the nation will create more prosperity and new jobs for all, – even including the ex-government employees. Then, the economy can grow again without the unnecessary and destructive governmental burdens. You might think that government spending will fill some cash gap. One problem with that idea is that government spending is mostly non-productive; i.e. : government‘s “services are mostly intangible and counterproductive. As a result, fewer people work to produce the products and services which the consumers want while hoards of bureaucrats make laws and rules and take more and more of our earnings. Little wonder that and why we need government financial subsidies. If government did not take so much of the worker’s pay, we a

truthseekertoo - 5/11/2011 3:21 PM
Everyone is for job creation? But none explain how to “create” jobs. As is self-evident, taxation means tax-payers will have less money to spend; but, that is not the only consequence of taxation. As taxes erode tax-payer purchasing power, purchasing demand falls off for all products and services. As a result, businesses owners will try to save what they can by cutting pay and reducing staff to match the lower levels of demand. That is what is happening right now. Even with the austerity actions, many companies will have to go out of business altogether. The result: overall prosperity slides down-hill. The more government tries to “help” by taking more money from those who are still working, to give to those who are not working, the worse the problem gets. To avoid more tragedy and travesty, the public and our political leaders must come to the understanding that government spending always carries a cost. Government cannot spend unless and until it has taken by way of: taxation, printing, and/or borrowing. Printing (aka:“quantitative easing”) waters down purchasing power. Borrowing requires interest payments. Government’s size mandates its budget requirements, and budgets set revenue requirements and revenue requirements force new tax increases and tax increases reduce taxpayer purchasing power which causes unemployment and business failure, which causes larger demands our governmental social spending which causes . . . Well, you get the idea?. The vicious circle spirals into collapse. We will find that producers eventually won’t take our money. The only reason the dollar has value is that people will still give us something of value for the money; and that support is beginning to fail. And, we can’t tax enough now to even pay the interest on the debt. Funny money economics is sure to sink America. The bureaucratic hordes that copy, process and featherbed the business of the state require the government to extract even more taxpa
National News
Judge: BP liable for civil penalties for oil spill
A federal judge has ruled that BP PLC and one of its minority partners in the blown-out Macondo well are liable for civil penalties under the Clean Water Act for their roles in the nation's worst offshore oil spill.

VampireDiaries

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.