Rochester Police Union Says Officers Threatened

Posted by: Rachel Barnhart
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/30/2011 6:38 pm
Rochester, N.Y. – The Rochester Police Locust Club, the union representing officers, defended officers’ conduct during the arrest of Emily Good. President Mike Mazzeo said several officers have received threats.

Good was charged with obstructing governmental administration while videotaping a traffic stop in front of her house. She refused an officer’s request to go in her house. The officer said he didn’t feel safe. Good’s video went viral, setting off a nationwide controversy. On Monday, prosecutors dropped the charge, citing lack of evidence.

“I don’t think any of our officers are going to get hung up on what happens in court. We live by that,” said Mazzeo.

Mazzeo wanted to make several points during a news conference:

• He said there were three occupants of the vehicle stopped by police. Good and some witnesses say there was one suspect.

• Good allegedly said she was friends with the suspects, causing the officer concern.

• Good was not arrested for videotaping police, but for refusing for comply with the officer’s request to go inside. The officer felt she was too physically close to the him and the vehicle.

“Let’s see the unedited version of the video,” Mazzeo said. “Let’s remember the officers in that video, more than anything, showed professionalism, composure and gave simple and concise orders.”

Mazzeo said the public should not interfere with a police officer’s job.

“The number one concern that we all share, that nobody interferes in a situation that could cause one of our officers or a member of the community to get hurt or killed,” Mazzeo said. “It’s just too dangerous the job we do out there.”

Mazzeo said several officers have gotten threats via message boards and phone calls. He said someone drove by the house of the officer who arrested Good, yelling threats.

“We leave our families at in our homes at night to come out and do this job. And when these idiots put our addresses out there on the network – you know that just opens it up for some mental defective or someone else to pick up on it and that’s just wrong,” Mazzeo said.

The department’s internal affairs unit is investigating the arrest and the subsequent ticketing of cars of Good’s supporters.

Share
19 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

deline - 8/5/2012 9:53 PM
0 Votes
Emily Good is a private citizen, video taping the public street from her private property. There is nothing illegal about that action and I hope to see a civil lawsuit for the false arrest. PhilO sounds like a police officer himself and while I sympathize with him and other officers having to do a dangerous duty, that does not give them right to obstruct lawful actions of private citizens on private property. In the video is it is very clear that she was several car lengths away from the police dispensing their duty and therefore not interfering with any police activity. On the contrary, police need to welcome private citizens to video tape incidents as part of keeping everyone accountable. The officer instead chose to bring negative attention on themselves by his actions, when he trespassed on private property and arrested Goodman. It is the duty of private citizens to report any unlawful actions, in particular of those of law enforcement officials, who tremendous state power at their disposal and easily abused. This is very simple: follow the law and there won't be any trouble and that goes for citizens as well as the police. Video taping is not a crime and it should be encouraged by the union.

PhilO - 7/3/2011 11:03 PM
0 Votes
As for anyone threatening police officers, or *anyone* - the police should put cameras in from of the officer's house and anyone caught making threats should be summarily arrested and put away for a few months!

PhilO - 7/3/2011 11:00 PM
0 Votes
I am outraged that the Rochester District attorney saw fit to dismiss Ms. Good's case, because that will *embolden* more people to get in the face of police officers, and create more potential for harm. Now, Ms. Good, who seems to be more of a professional agitator than anything else, is going to sue to good people of the City of Rochester for *her* bad judgment! Why doesn't Ms. Good walk about with her camera filming illegal drug transactions at middle schools? Too dangerous for you, Ms. Good? This is a slippery slope we're on, one that reminds me of the excesses of the 60's where cops were regularly called "pigs". Ms. Good and her like are not innocent bystanders; they are agitators. When Rodney King was mercilessly beaten by some bad cops, the film was shot from a great distance. Some bad cops were disciplined, and rightly so. I, for one, am sick and tired of everyone assuming that cops are *likely* to violate one's rights! How many street stops are conducted in America every day? Probably thousands and thousands - a tiny fraction of those lead to civil rights abuse, yet we let professional agitators like Emily Good besmirch the good will of ALL police officers. Disgusting, and outrageous!

PhilO - 7/3/2011 10:58 PM
0 Votes
I think it's outrageous that Emily Good was able to violate the request of a police officer who asked her to move back to her house. How dare *anyone*, unless a police officer is *clearly* braking a law, think that it is OK to move within 10-15' of a police officer on a poorly lit street (extremely dark), in a *dangerous* neighborhood, during a street stop. The officer *never* told Emily Good to stop taping; he asked her to move back because he said he didn't "feel safe". What if that traffic stop had gone bad? What if the person they stopped had had a training car of thugs with weapons? What if Ms. Good had become involved in unexpected mayhem, just because she was *too close*? Could Ms. Good being *too close* to a police action on a dangerous street in near pitch darkness be construed by a police officer as creating a scenario that keeps him/her from "feeling safe"? Of course it does! What really gets me about Emily Good's action is that people like her have already made up their minds about the potential for police abuse, and they put themselves *and others* in harm's way to get their "proof".

sflesch - 7/1/2011 11:15 AM
0 Votes
Everyone seems to like making this into the video taping, but the officer NEVER asked her to stop taping. For the common folk it may not seem it, but he DID give her a lawful order. It was reasonable, especially on a dark night with her close proximity for the officer to ask her to go back inside. Even after her arrest, they were allowed to continue to video tape. If video taping was the issue, don't you think they would have asked them at least once to stop? Don't you think they would have taken the video camera with them if not to stop the recording? Now people are threatening an officer AND HIS FAMILY. That is brutal and disgusting. Ms. Good was just looking for trouble and she forced the issue. I would challenge any one of you to take a criminal justice course and go for a ride-along and see if you don't back the officer's actions in this case. I would also argue that the DA who dismissed the charges did so hoping the case would go away more than per a lack of evidence. I don't think they took into account how much worse it would be for the officer when they dropped the charge.

IWantJustice - 7/1/2011 9:36 AM
1 Vote
A badge and a gun does NOT give you the right to take away someone's civil liberties. The cops were wrong, and Good did NOTHING wrong. The RPD union, like most unions are pathetic in that they defend their members more than they defend their profession. Any cop worth a lick of salt would be appalled by the RPD.

IWantJustice - 7/1/2011 9:32 AM
1 Vote
These cops are disgusting creatures. They clearly don't care about "serving with pride" as they let their irrational fears (which means they should quit) or their bullying personalities get in the way of doing their job properly. That the Union is standing up for these cops who clearly were in the wrong is a sad commentary on the RPD. These cops should be fired, not defended by other cops. It is clear that the cops are not here to serve the people.

jcreitano - 7/1/2011 9:15 AM
0 Votes
emily good is a peice of !@#$. how fast she called the cops when someone broke in her house.i wonder why she didn't call her supporter. good thing for her i'm not a cop because she could be on fire and i would not care.

BassWorld - 6/30/2011 11:05 PM
1 Vote
The police officers played right into her ploy. She wanted to be arrested, why hasn't anyone figured that out? She acted in a perfectly legal manner, but pushed the envelope, and displayed "contempt of cop". She sensed, or knew, that Officer Masic couldn't resist the opportunity to show this smart mouthed woman who was in charge. Imagine what might have happened if, when Emily Good showed up to tape their actions, they might have ignored her, or even waved at the camera. Unless their training is substandard, a small, petite woman armed only with a camera isn't much of a threat to these highly masculine and testosterone laden officers. So, had the officers ignored her, we wouldn't be having these conversations. They wouldn't be threatened, Emily Good wouldn't have been arrested, and the police union representative wouldn't be earning his exorbitant salary. Somehow she knew what would happen. Ever waved a red flag in front of a bull? It's so predictable.

taxablechump - 6/30/2011 10:47 PM
0 Votes
"mental Defective" is strikingly low brow and so terribly archaic, that it deserves rebuke and warrants an apology
State News
National News
Russia, US continue to spy on each other
The embarrassing arrest of a suspected CIA officer in Moscow is the latest reminder that the U.S. and Russia are still engaged in an espionage battle with secret tactics, spying devices and specialized training.

TheOffice

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.