13WHAM Weather Authority Alert: Lake Effect Snow Warning expires at 6:00 AM on 2/13, issued at 1:34 AM Alton, NY | Clyde, NY | East Williamson, NY | Lyons, NY

Webster Teen Charged With Distributing Sexually Explicit Images

Reported by: Sean Carroll
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 10/01/2008 8:08 am
(Lyons/Webster, N.Y.) - A 16-year-old Webster boy is facing felony charges for something many kids do; exchanging pictures or movies over their cell phones. 

But, in this case, Wayne County Sheriff’s investigators said the pictures being exchanged were pornographic images of a 15-year-old girl.  This constitutes child pornography, and when John Sciabica allegedly sent them to friends, he committed another crime, according to police.

It began when the girl sent sexually explicit images of herself through a cell phone to Sciabica and he was technically possessing child pornography.

"Not too smart from her to actually go through with it, a trusting situation that is going to be a private situation between two people," Wayne County Sheriff’s investigator Lt. Robert Hetzke said.  "But, he enticed her to do that."

The crime may have gone unnoticed, but detectives say Sciabica didn't keep the images to himself. Instead, he sent them to friends in his phone’s address book, beginning a string of messages that landed on an unknown number of phones or computers. 

When one of those recipients contacted the 15-year-old victim, she and her parents went to the police.

"Now her picture is out there, and we don't know how far it is out there," Hetzke said. "You know once it gets transferred to a telephone that can easily be transferred to an e-mail account, an e-mail account can go out and it could be anyplace in the world with technology."

Sciabica's attorney said the charges exaggerate what really happened. He claims his client received images the victim took, and despite being a young teen he's now facing felony criminal charges and possible jail time.

Investigators see the facts of the case quite differently.

"He disseminated it, promoted it, passed it on to other juveniles and adults, these nude pictures of a juvenile which is a crime," Hetzke said.  "Be it the Internet or a telephone, once you hit that ‘send button’ you can't get it back and it's gone, and it's out there, and it happens really fast."

Sciabica’s lawyer said, while being sensitive to the female victim in this circumstance, these charges also provide some level of embarrassment and serious consequences to his client, who is just a year older than the victim. He worries the statutes on the law books don't reflect the society that technology has created, and he’s now handled a few similar cases this year.

Investigators say the charges in cases similar to this one can potentially become federal crimes, with much more serious penalties, if digital images cross state lines.

According to Wayne County Sheriff's Detectives, John Sciabica currently faces a charge of Promoting aA Sexual Performance of a child less than 17 years of age, and another charge for Possessing a Sexual Performance by a child less than 16 years old.  Sciabica is due back in court next month to answer to these charges.

Share
97 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

sactap6969 - 9/23/2008 11:39 AM
ashley michaels from wayne is the one who should be charged! this boy was just doing what every other boy does when they are bored. ashley michaels is the one who hit the send button first.... how is this kid supposed to know its a felony charge??? do they learn it in school??? didnt think so. so im just trying to say that im sure this kid has learned his lesson and he should be able to live a normal life. he probably gets so many comments a day from people that dont know both sides of the story.

City Resident - 9/16/2008 12:52 PM
When it goes to court, will the men on the Jury have to look at the video of a naked 15 yr old girl doing things to herself? Would the court then be guilty of showing it? I think the police should track all of the images sent and stop them from going any further. But if the boy is charged, the girl should be as well. Kids do kids things, maybe the parents are a bit at fault here?

VeenieJo - 9/16/2008 12:41 PM
If possessing and/or forwarding the pics/videos is a crime, then "Criminal #1" is the girl in this case. If they are going to prosecute the boy, then the girl should be prosecuted also. After all, if "Criminal #1" had not taken the photos and forwarded them on, then it would have been impossible for "Criminal #2" to even exist! On a side note, it would be interesting to know if this was the first time "Criminal #1" has ever sent such items on to others, or if it's a little hobby of hers... --A Mother/Stepmother of 4 Teenagers with Cell Phones

Aderryn - 9/15/2008 10:35 AM
Wags - I actually have internet and texting blocked at my request. AT&T deactivates the services. And since my daughter doesn't have her own phone anyway, that's a moot point for us...our family shares 2 phones, both with no camera, no internet and no text messaging :-) Frankly, if it comes down to it, we do not NEED a cell phone. If I can't get one without a camera, I just won't replace the ones we have! Oh, and I do check my bill online frequently...I check my account on at least a weekly basis so I would notice pretty quickly if there were downloads being dont! And really, if my daughter is the exception that is really too bad. Parents need to parent rather than befriending their children. You will have enough time to be their friend when they are grown. Setting limits is the responsibility of parents who want to do a good job.

Wags23 - 9/15/2008 9:11 AM
Aderryn: Seriously that’s good your daughter knows that. I think your daughter is the EXCEPTION in this case, where most parents would just give their child a cell phone. But a heads up for ya. How long do you think cell phones are just going to be coming without cameras? As cell phone companies continue to decrease the cost to make a camera phone, the camera feature will just be implemented into every single new cell phone. And you'll pay for it, they'll advertise that 'this cell phone has camera capabilities' even though it's not costing them a lot to do, that will still keep the price of the phone up so that the companies can keep profits up. On a side note, just trying to help you out. I got my cell phone with camera capabilities about 2 years ago and I use my cell phone for calling and texting purposes but there still is a way to access the internet from it. If your daughter had a cell phone and was 'smart' or 'dumb' enough, assuming you don't check your bill online, the day after you receive your bill in the mail, she could access the internet on it for a month with out you even knowing. You'll just see a crazy total on your bill at the end of the month.

PburgBill - 9/14/2008 11:10 AM
The initial transgressor in this case was the girl. Shame on the press for taking for taking this case so public as to publish the boys face and name. Initials would have been the only proper way to publish an identity of a juvenile. The boy is a JUVENILE and so is the girl. It is shameful that the press wrongfully exposed his name and picture on TV thereby compounding the tragedy. If you check the docket on the day that this young man and girl go to court you will only see their initials as defendants. This is how you idiots in the press should have treated this matter. With a bit of discretion and understanding that the children in this case are without capacity to make reasoned decisions as do adults.

Aderryn - 9/13/2008 4:24 PM
Faith, That is EXACTLY my point! I would never say never about my own kid. I remember only too well what it was like being a teenager. I can, however, say NEVER when it comes to what I will, or will not do. I will NEVER allow my daughter to have a cell phone with a camera or internet access, or text messaging while it is within my power to do so. Same thing with having a computer in her room. Won't happen while she is in my house. Fortunately, while her father and I are no longer together, he agrees with these things and so this won't happen at his house either. Kids will do a LOT of stupid things. We won't even learn about those things until years later, in some cases. All I can control is what I, personally, give my child access to. She will have to work harder than a lot of other kids to make the same mistakes that these kids made. I'm far from naive so I know the pressures she will face. And I know she will make mistakes in judgment...that's part of the age. BUT...I can hope that by being firm and setting limits, I will help keep her from making mistakes that can last her into adulthood.

Faith - 9/13/2008 12:52 PM
Aderryn - You should be proud that your ten year old realizes. But please know that having gone thru the teenage years twice....both my kids were actually good kids. As much as talked (and continue to talk)....We keep our eyes open...and say alot of prayers. Because when they enter that 15 and up age. It is tough - because as parents we struggle with the peer influence. Never say Never...Cause I have a sister that was convinced that her child would never get into trouble...She knew better. While I have always realized the balance is delicate...given the right set of circumstances (why I never say my child wouldn't)...any kid...no matter how good the parents are...is capable of being influenced and doing something contrary to what their parents have taught them. Which is why it's not safe to judge someone until you have walked in their shoes.

italypride - 9/13/2008 2:08 AM
I hope the Judge thinks about his/her youth during the court case. We have all made stupid mistakes when we were growing up. Let this just be a lesson for others the severity of what could happen. DO NOT sentence this good kid.

Aderryn - 9/12/2008 8:39 PM
Wags23: In the car on the way to lacrosse practice, my almost-11 year old daughter mentioned that she had heard this case on RNews. I said to her "Daughter, I hope you would never do something as stupid as taking a picture of yourself naked and sending it to anyone." Her response? "Mom, that would never happen because even if I wanted to do that, you will never let me have a cell phone with a camera or internet." Those are direct quotes and it was not a planned conversation. If my TEN YEAR OLD realizes that a parent can HELP to prevent this sort of thing by having non-negotiable rules (a phone is a phone, not a camera, not a computer w/ internet), then I can not understand why it's so hard for PARENTS to understand the same thing. I am not here to be my daughter's best friend, although I adore her and cherish her...I am here to help her learn to be a good, smart adult possessed of common sense and good values. Period.
State News
Hearing shifts to fired Syracuse coach's wife
Lawyers for two men who say they were molested as boys by fired Syracuse University assistant basketball coach Bernie Fine say salacious allegations about Fine's wife are relevant in their slander lawsuit.

GreysAnatomy

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.