Property Owners Sue City Over $100 Fees

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/16/2011 5:52 pm
Rochester, N.Y. – On November 2, 2010, the city sent out 4,325 letters to property owners assessing a $100 “case management fee” for code violations that had been outstanding for more than a year.

Mary D’Alessandro, who owns a rental property on Emerson St., received one of the letters.

“I am sick and tired of being nickel and dimed and all the other residents being nickel and dimed,” she said. D’Alessandro is active in landlord associations.

D’Alessandro and five other property owners filed a lawsuit against the city over the fees. They suspect the city did not inspect all of those properties. They also claim they are not getting due process.

“They are imposing a penalty on me illegally without a fair trial,” D’Alessandro said.

City Council passed a law in 2009 that permits the case management fees. The intent of the law is to encourage property owners to keep up their residences and offset the cost of inspections and code violation cases that can drag on for several years. The fees sent out in November were the first the city assessed under the law.

Residents have 10 days to appeal the $100 fines.

City spokesman Gary Walker said the city was limited in what it could say about the situation, because of the pending litigation. However, he said that 583 people filed appeals and 392 had their fees voided. He said that’s evidence the system is working.

D’Alessandro’s attorney said it shows the opposite.

“Many of the people imposed a fee on were not guilty should never have paid a fee, but unless they protested within 10 days the fee would not be waived,” said D’Alessandro’s attorney, Michael Burger. “But even if they protested, after a citizen protested, the only way a citizen can fight a $100 fee, is to file a $210 lawsuit.”

D’Alessandro appealed and had her fee thrown out on the grounds her violations hadn’t been outstanding for more than a year.

“The government has to stop violating people’s rights,” she said. “They have to stop nickel and diming us on picky little crap. If they have a problem with their budget they should do what the rest of us do – cut back.”

Walker said the city sent out 265 additional case management fees in January.
Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of 13WHAM-TV || Rochester

eggzackary - 3/19/2011 11:10 AM
0 Votes
I bought a house in the city from my brother in law. We bought it as our residence not a rental. As soon as I moved in I started getting code violation notices regarding the metal trim around a small portion of my roof. It wasn't hanging or anything, a piece was missing. Since we already planned on replacing the roof I called the city and explained this would be taken care of when we replaced the roof. This appeased the city for a few months. Since at that time it was winter and a new roof was going to cost around $10,000, we waited until it was warmer and could get a loan. Being a new homeowner and having other things to fix to make the house actually livable (instead of worrying about how the outside looked to others) this took a little longer than we expected. I started receiving more letters and made the mistake of giving my phone number to the city so they could call me constantly. I then received a fine which I paid. The roof was fixed the following month, along with the metal. All this because I tried to do the right thing. My brother in law informed me he had been receiving the same violation notice for the same problem for years and just ignored it. So because I called and was trying to comply and do the right thing, I was punished. Mind you, my house is on Clay Ave, my lawn is well taken care of, I don't leave trash all over my front lawn, and other than that piece of metal the outside of the house is otherwise in good shape. It's not a rental and I planned to raise my family in the city as I was. This has made me totally rethink this plan and I will be moving to the suburbs. Thanks city for harassing a good person who wanted to support living in the city of Rochester.

SpoonmanWoS - 3/17/2011 4:26 PM
0 Votes
Here's a thought, slumlords: fix your properties and you won't get these fines. I got one of these once because I hadn't been able to mow my lawn for a few weeks. I did so, they reinspected, case over. Took me all of one phone call to make it go away. You've had a year to dispute the original claim and then complain when the city tells you "Time's up!" Wah, wah, wah...this isn't government intrusion, this is businesses owners getting benefit from the community (by being allowed to rent out spaces) but not giving back. Just keep taking and taking...the revolution's coming, and we're well aware it's not the government that's the problem. It's you. Here's another thought: America, love it or get the "F" out. If you don't like doing business in the city, leave. We'll get honest folks in who are willing to do what's right and pay their fair share.

Letsnotfight - 3/17/2011 11:02 AM
0 Votes
Just another form of price gouging to drive homeowners and possible homeowners out of the city... why not get them (the homeowners) all together to police themselves, and make sure that each neighborhood follows the code restrictions, and just take care of things as they need to be repaired... why not just be fair to those who keep up their properties...

sick n tired - 3/16/2011 11:03 PM
0 Votes
There is no way this can go on much longer!!! It's not that the city or state even needs to cut back on anything, it is just a plain case of mismanagement of funds...Our whole nation has been doing it far to long. The government gets to spend money it doesn't have to work for, the result; squandered tax dollars. To make up for the squandering, more taxes...Now NY is crying budget cut this and budget cut that, when their should have been a budget all along when there was surplus instead of all the squandering and steeling!!!

jimlew - 3/16/2011 9:35 PM
3 Votes
My support to the people who are litigating the city. They have a massive deficit year after year and like every government entity, just crucify the people. To me if they abolished almost 3/4's of the appeals... it surely looks like just another money raising scam by the fiscally inept city employees.

MattG - 3/16/2011 9:22 PM
3 Votes
The city is in budget trouble so they turn the people to pick up the gap. They don't turn and try to cut back in other areas, they just come up with crazy other ways of taxing people. Then the city wonders why people are moving to the burbs and why the property values are dropping and why there are so many houses that are just empty! You think they would try to do something to attract people to the city, not turn them away! Shame on you City of Rochester!

fiveteeth - 3/16/2011 4:30 PM
2 Votes
My father owned city income property for many years.He,too,had been sent code violations without ever seeing an inspector on the premises.He was given a small amount of time to finish the repairs.Once he did complete them,he would receive a follow-up report.NOT to his surprise,the follow-up contained the repairs made but,included a whole new list of violations usually,twice as long as the first list..The City has tried to make money off of anyone who lives here,even some that don't.If you are associated with Rochester..BAM! you're included!If you own property in Rochester,go to the landlord meetings in your area!Be informed of your legal rights."Nickel and Dime"..should be "Hundreds and Thousands".I am so glad he sold them and moved out of state.
National News

TheOffice

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.